The ABCM Model of Conflict Analysis and Zen Buddhism: Transforming Conflict into Peace

Authors

  • Cuong Manh Nguyen International Academy for Religion and Peace Studies Author
  • White Cloud Author

Keywords:

Diamond Sutra; ABCM Diamond Model; No-Self; Interbeing; Conflict Transformation; Inner Peace

Abstract

To fill the gap of the previous studies, the paper examines the current global conflicts, such as the Ukraine and Iran conflicts, by the mindfulness approach. The classical theories of international relations such as realism, liberalism, and constructivism often are not able to deal with these conflicts, as they do not take into consideration cognitive distortions and ego attachments which influence perceptions of decision-makers and political leaders. In order to fill this gap, the paper integrates the key ideas of the Diamond Sutra to reformulate the ABCM Diamond model of conflict, where this model can be employed to promote internal peace by adding mindfulness (M) as a fourth dimension to the ABC triangle of Galtung. By relying on the "logic of not" of the Diamond Sutra, the paper illustrates how decision-makers can turn the subconscious root poisons of greed, anger and ignorance into the clarity of inter-being. This cognitive-ethical change replaces the reactive and egoistic behaviour with the reflective equanimity and unconditional compassion. When the decision-makers can adopt this approach, inner peace can be obtained, leading to external peace to resolve regional and global conflicts.

References

Brown, W. (2012). Africa and international relations: A realist perspective. Cambridge University Press.

Burchill, S. (2005). The national interest in international relations theory. Palgrave Macmillan.

Eriksson, J., & Giacomello, G. (2006). The digital divide and international relations: Institutions, interdependence, and the politics of insecurity. International Studies Review, 8(1), 1–20

Freedman, L. (2025). New perspectives on trust and fear in international conflicts. Oxford Academic.

Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, peace, and peace research. Journal of Peace Research, 6(3), 167–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/002234336900600301

Cited by: 38

Galtung, J. (1976). Three approaches to peace: Peacekeeping, peacemaking and peacebuilding. Impact of Science on Society.

Galtung, J. (1985). Twenty-five years of peace research: Ten challenges and some responses. Journal of Peace Research, 22(2), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/002234338502200207

Galtung, J. (1990). Cultural violence. Journal of Peace Research, 27(3), 291–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343390027003005

Galtung, J. (2010). Peace by peaceful means: Peace and conflict, development and civilization. Sage Publications.

Nguyen, M.-C., Chelabi, K., Anjum, S., Kumari, S., Samoylenko, S., Silwizya, K., & Nghiem, T. (2024). Mindfulness approach and the redefined analysis model of conflict: The case study of the Ukraine conflict. Social Sciences, 13(11), 564. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13110564

Nguyen, M.-C., et al. (2025). The cognitive-ethical model of peacebuilding: Transforming the three poisons through mindfulness. [Forthcoming/In Press].

Thich Nhat Hanh. (1991). Peace is every step: The path of mindfulness in everyday life. Bantam Books.

Thich Nhat Hanh. (1998). The heart of the Buddha's teaching: Transforming suffering into peace, joy, and liberation. Broadway Books.

Thich Nhat Hanh. (2008). The art of power. HarperOne.

Thich Nhat Hanh. (2016). At home in the world: Stories and essential teachings from a monk's life. Parallax Press.

Waelde, L. C., Miller, A., & Robinson, A. (2019). Mindfulness for peacebuilders: Effects on mental health and peacebuilding capacity. Journal of Peacebuilding & Development, 14(3), 332–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/1542316619866952

Downloads

Published

2026-05-25