Understanding Barriers to Public Recycling Behaviour in Hamburg: A Mixed-Methods Study of Human–Technology Interaction and User-Centred Design
Keywords:
Behavioural UX, User-centered design, Smart cities, Nudge theory, Human robot interaction, Public recycling behaviour, Mixed-methods research, Technology acceptance modelAbstract
This study investigates why individuals disengage from appropriate recycling behaviour at public collection points and examines the interaction-design and behavioural factors underlying this gap. The study employed a Sequential Mixed Methods approach between March and June 2026. Research began with sensory observations of existing recycling environments, followed by semi-structured interviews with residents and stakeholders (Stadtreinigung Hamburg and Starship Technologies), a community focus group, behavioural data collection, and an online survey. A total of 83 survey responses were collected, of which 55 were included in the final analysis. The combination of qualitative and quantitative methods enabled cross-validation of findings and provided a broader understanding of users' needs, expectations, and experiences. Findings triangulated across methods indicate that incorrect disposal is driven less by the willingness to recycle than by difficulties in decision-making at the point of disposal. Most participants generally expressed interest in recycling and a willingness to contribute, but their ability to act on this intention was affected by cognitive load, poor environmental visibility, low trust in system outcomes, and a mismatch between institutional system logic and users' everyday mental models. The study also identifies openness toward robot-assisted waste collection, tempered by concerns regarding data privacy, reliability, and cost.
These findings inform a set of evidence-based design requirements for human-centered recycling interventions in dense urban environments and provide the empirical foundation for the design developed from these findings, which is beyond the scope of the present study.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Copyright (c) 2026 the Author(s)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 the Author(s)